| Electronic Components Datasheet Search |
|
AN2450 Datasheet(PDF) 21 Page - STMicroelectronics |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AN2450 Datasheet(HTML) 21 Page - STMicroelectronics |
|
21 / 35 page ![]() DocID12784 Rev 6 21/35 AN2450 Magnetic integration 35 5 Magnetic integration The LLC resonant half-bridge is well suited for magnetic integration, i.e. to combine the inductors as well as the transformer into a single magnetic device. This can be easily recognized looking at the transformer's physical model in Figure 9, where the topological analogy with the inductive part of the LLC tank circuit is apparent. However, the real transformer has leakage inductance on the secondary side as well, which is completely absent in the model considered so far. To include the effect of secondary leakage in the FHA analysis, we need a particular transformer model and a simplifying assumption. It is well known that there are an infinite number of electrically equivalent models of a given transformer, depending on the choice of the turn ratio of the ideal transformer included in the model. With an appropriate choice of this “equivalent” turn ratio n (obviously different from the “physical” turn ratio nt = N1/N2) all the elements related to leakage flux can be located on the primary side. This is the APR (all primary referred) model shown in Figure 10, which fits the circuit considered in the FHA analysis. It is possible to show that the APR model is obtained with the following choice of n: Equation 51 with k transformer's coupling coefficient, L1 inductance of the primary winding and L2 inductance of each secondary winding. Note that Lr still has physical meaning: it is the primary inductance measured with the secondary windings shorted. Note also that the primary inductance L1 must be unchanged. It is only differently split in the 2 models of Figure 9 and Figure 10, hence, Lm will be the difference between L1 and Lr. In the end, the analysis done so far is directly applicable to real-world transformers provided they are represented by their equivalent APR model. Vice versa, a design flow based on the FHA analysis will provide the parameters of the APR model; hence, an additional step is needed to determine those of the physical model. In particular this applies to the turn number nt, since Lr and Lm still have a connection with the physical world (Lr + Lm = LL1 + Lµ = L1). Figure 9. Transformer's physical model nk L1 L2 ------ = Lμ Ideal Transformer n t : 1 : 1 Magnetizing inductance Sec. leakage inductance L L1 L L2a L L2b Sec. leakage inductance Prim. leakage inductance Lμ Ideal Transformer n t : 1 : 1 Magnetizing inductance Sec. leakage inductance L L1 L L2a L L2b Sec. leakage inductance Prim. leakage inductance |
|
Link URL |
| Does ALLDATASHEET help your business so far? [ DONATE ] |
About Alldatasheet | Advertisement | Contact us | Privacy Policy | Link to Datasheet | Link Exchange | Manufacturer List All Rights Reserved©Alldatasheet.com |
| Russian : Alldatasheetru.com | Korean : Alldatasheet.co.kr | Spanish : Alldatasheet.es | French : Alldatasheet.fr | Italian : Alldatasheetit.com Portuguese : Alldatasheetpt.com | Polish : Alldatasheet.pl | Vietnamese : Alldatasheet.vn Indian : Alldatasheet.in | Mexican : Alldatasheet.com.mx | British : Alldatasheet.co.uk | New Zealand : Alldatasheet.co.nz |
|
Family Site : ic2ic.com |
icmetro.com |